🔗 Share this article

Critics have charged British American Tobacco with “total contradiction” for campaigning against tobacco control measures in Africa that currently exist in the UK.

African regulatory opposition

Correspondence acquired by reporters originating from the firm's affiliate in Zambia to the nation's political leaders demands plans to ban tobacco marketing and promotional activities to be abandoned or delayed.

The company is attempting amendments to a pending law that include decreasing the suggested dimensions of pictorial cautions on cigarette packaging, the elimination of limitations on flavored smoking items, and diminished punishments for any firms breaking the new laws.

Health advocate reaction

“Were I in government, I would say that they permit the protection of the British people and perpetuate the death of the Zambian people,” said Master Chimbala.

Over seven thousand citizens a year succumb to smoking-associated diseases, according to global health agency statistics.

The advocate mentioned the letter was believed to have been distributed to multiple official agencies and was in distribution within public interest organizations.

Worldwide lobbying patterns

The situation emerges alongside expanded apprehension about corporate intervention with health policies. In recent weeks, international health experts issued a warning that the smoking product companies was escalating campaigns to weaken global control measures.

“We see evidence of business advocacy everywhere. Manufacturer hallmarks are on deferred levy rises in Indonesia, halted laws in Zambia and even a compromised resolution at the UN international gathering,” commented Jorge Alday.

Likely impacts

“If a tobacco control measure doesn't get enacted because of this letter, the cost might be borne in individuals' health who might possibly give up cigarettes.”

The public health measure progressing through Zambia’s parliament includes measures that exceed UK legislation by also applying to e-cigarettes, and requiring that graphic health warnings cover three-quarters of product packaging.

Company alternative suggestions

In the letter, the company recommends this be lowered to less than half “within the WHO-FCTC recommended threshold”, delayed for at least twelve months after the law is enacted.

The WHO actually suggests a caution must occupy at least 50% of the front of a pack “and seek to occupy as much of the primary showing sections as possible”. In the UK, warnings are required to occupy 65% of a packet’s front and back.

Flavor restrictions debate

The corporation requests the withdrawal of extensive controls on scented smoking items, arguing that it would lead smokers to “illegally traded” products. The corporation recommends restricting fewer varieties of “tastes inspired by desserts, candy, energy drinks, soft drinks and alcohol drinks”. All flavoured cigarettes have been banned in the UK since 2020.

The pending regulation suggests penalties for multiple violations “varying from a percentage of annual turnover to ten-year jail sentences”.

Business explanation

Through correspondence, the company executive of British American Tobacco Zambia states the firm is “committed to responsible corporate conduct” and “backs the goals of governments to decrease cigarette consumption and the connected wellbeing effects” but maintains that “some regulations can have negative and unanticipated results.”

Activist reaction

Chimbala said the company's suggested modifications would “dilute these regulations so much that the required influence for it to cause long-term change in society will not be achieved”.

The reality that many such provisions were present in the UK, where BAT is headquartered, was “utter hypocrisy itself”, he commented.

“We reside in a global village. When I cultivate smoking products in my garden and collect the yield and market the products – and my children do not consume tobacco, but my neighbor's family uses … to profit individually and all the subsequent offspring while my neighbour’s children are succumbing … is in itself absolute spiritual failure.”

Anti-smoking regulations in the United Kingdom or other countries had not caused companies to close, the campaigner stated. “Laws don't eliminate the industry. They merely safeguard the people.”

Formal company response

The company representative said: “BAT Zambia conducts its business in compliance with applicable local laws. Further, the company participates in the country’s legislative process in line with the appropriate structures which enable interested party involvement in policymaking.”

The firm positioned itself as “not against rules”, the spokesperson stated, adding that young individuals should be protected from access to tobacco and nicotine.

“We support evolving legislation to achieve intended public health goals, while acknowledging the spectrum of privileges and responsibilities on businesses, users and involved parties,” they said, noting that the company's suggestions “reflect the realities of the local commercial environment and cigarette sector, which involves rising levels of black market activity”.

Zambia’s department of trade, commerce and industry was approached for comment.